MUHAMMAD AZAM versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Through negotiation, a lawsuit was filed for the recovery of debt on the basis of Act 1881 Sections 4, 118 and 119 Civil Procedure Code 1908, Section 151 Law on Evidence (Article 10), Article 129 Sweet Promotional Note but refused. Didn't the defendant's contentious summarize sign the tax receipt sign that he did not pay the tax, his signature was for the payment of salary and the promise was a result of the vacancy. The execution of the ordinary and the same person's promissory notes was a genuine decision and the decree passed against the defendant was maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Peshawar lawyer
