ASHIQ versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Guarantee, the claim that the accused killed by fireworks injuries was canceled. The person of the co-accused had three injuries that were not explained to him by the prosecution in the case of hurting his brother and other son, which showed that the accused and his co-accused brother. Has been used in favor of defense and is yet to be decided by the trial court which has not explained any of the injuries to any of the parties' co-accused persons. Was used, but the force used by the accused in the murder of the victim was completely disputed, which was used arbitrarily to bail the accused person to the accused. On the alleged use of his right to self-defense, he was acquitted, bail was granted to the accused under trial, and injuries sustained on the co-accused were suppressed by the prosecution. In this case, the trial court's order under which the bail was granted to the co-accused was not interfered with by the prosecution's request for the cancellation of the bail of the participant, even though the accused's request was granted so far. And it was ordered to be taken inside. He faces trial in custody
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Wazirabad lawyer