Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

EJAZ AHMAD versus HAMEED FATIMA


Articles 12 and 13 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court appeal agreement were filed by the wife / defendant while the restoration was made. The lawsuit is for. After the marital rights were filed by the husband / appellant parties, the trial case was entered into a settlement, and the trial court granted the judgment and decision under the trial. Passed the Constitution with the exception of jurisdiction. That the trial court's statement of settlement was without oath. The High Court dismissed the intra-court appeal on the constitutional petition where the appellant of the husband made a statement and agreed to settle the case on the basis of this agreement, they could neither compromise nor deal with it. Therefore, the decision reached and accordingly passed was fair and equitable in which there was no error or justification to interfere.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Bhera lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.