RABNAWAZ KHAN versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Due to the appearance and non-appearance of the parties to the CPC, the petition for the separation of Civil Procedure Code Order IX, IX, R 13 and Section 115 ex parte decree was submitted on the same day in which the applicants filed a trial court. I had arranged matters. The request for a dismissal was dismissed after three years for illegal prosecution. The request for reinstatement was filed within time but was dismissed. The petition filed by the petitioners got the same fate, where the applicants had stated that their lawyer was engaged before the District Judge. This was enough to determine the applicant's former MP, Mukhtar Khas, who was serving in another city, in which case his statement also rejected the application for the re-establishment of the applications and to re-establish the applications. Was enough for Their jurisdiction was illegal and with irregularities in the material which was due to non-readability and misrepresentation of evidence or the decisions and orders of the following courts were set aside by the High Court in an amendment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Dhirkot lawyer