Find a Lawyer

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE versus SOBIA CHAND

Section 29 of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act 1976 and 31 Punjab Education Code (Rules and Regulations), R 29 appeared on the Secondary School Examination of the candidate's birth date in the Education Board candidate's record and got through the same dispute. Tho candidate stated that due to the negligence of the school staff, his date of birth on his admission form was incorrect, the board candidate rejected it due to a minor suit filed by his mother, the board maintainability suit. The decision was made in favor of the candidate and an appeal was also filed by the board. The alleged wrongdoing in connection with the birth of a candidate during admission to a sixth grade, the school staff, thus, cannot be accused of any (hypothetical) error on the admission form, by the candidate. Subject to the provisions of the civil suit brought under section 29 and 31 of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act, 1976 where proceedings were taken in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the jurisdiction of the civil court under section 29 of the said Act was removed. Was done, if any action was taken in good faith, though the relevant provisions of the law were strictly This was not done by you, but accordingly only his jurisdiction was removed. Under Section 31 of the Act, the suit was suitable for the candidate and his next friend proceeded on the assumption that the candidate was a minor where, in the jurisdiction of the Board's Committee, there was no allegation of goodwill and good faith. ? The civil court of the two jurisdictions clearly stood out top advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer