Code of Conduct 1908 Section 114 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), petitioner of Article 199 Constitution, petitioner filed a review petition in the trial court, instead, after hearing the rehabilitation case, the verdict of restitution was pronounced against him, Then the constitutional petition against it, which was raised before the trial court cases, was decided on these points and they were answered in the trial court's decision, nothing was brought on the record so that it appeared. Because the trial court's ruling and ruling contained either some cause or a patent error. , Or that there was some fresh evidence or material that was not available at the time the order was passed, that the review application was misunderstood and that there was no illegal action by the courts below the interference in the constitutional petition Was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
