RAB NAWAZ & COMPANY versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, WASA
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional petition Contractor Refund of security deposit submitted by the applicant, a contractor completed the work of the respondent authority and the respondent authority did not return the security amount to the applicant. The payee authority is willing to pay the said amount after the deduction of a particular amount did not change the applicant's fixed makeup switch as the price difference was that the switchover was installed with the approval of the claimant director. In which the plaintiff's authority acknowledged the decision, respondent et al Harty was not, according to the letter of approval. Thus, there is no justification for the deduction of money, as such, exists in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer
