CH. MUHAMMAD MASAUD AKHTAR KHAN versus REGISTRAR LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Section ((b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 1 (185 ()) to take advantage of personal misconduct performed by Judge Scope and consequently, due to a dissatisfaction record with the financial relief judge's service) The inquiry committee found that the District and Sessions Judge (applicant) was guilty of acquiring a former party decree on disputed property against all legal principles and when such an order was rejected by the High Court. He remained in possession of the property, and did not disclose any such property in any of his declarations. The Property Inquiry Committee recommends the implementation of mandatory retirement penalties, the Inquiry Committee agreed to the finding, the High Court accepted the judge's request for retirement from the job, and he retired from the job. The disciplinary proceedings were terminated after which a notification was issued. District and Sessions Judges were given a selection grade (BS21), while Judge W, as most of them were senior, was ignored before the High Court rejected the representation filed by the judge. Was dismissed and his appeal before the service tribunal was dismissed on the ground that he could not be given the benefit of notification due to his unsatisfactory service record, and even against the decision of the department authority who was in Punjab. Section 5 (b) of the Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act holds that a department determines a person's fitness for development No appeal was allowed before the tribunal against the decision of the authority; the legitimate judge in question was the most
