MEHMOOD AMJED versus ISLAMABAD CAPITAL TERRITORY POLICE THROUGH I.-G. POLICE, ISLAMABAD
R13 8 (2) Development of Head Constable, Examination for splitting candidates into different batches Instead of a combined list for all batches, prepare separate seniority list for each batch of 413 other constables as well as lower school courses. Legacy Appellant was selected for. For the convenience of the police department, the candidates were divided into three batches and the appellant was placed in batch number 3 and successfully passed the course and was placed in serial number 4 of the final result of his batch, while the three Their overall position in the course was the applicant's sixth consolidation in batches that a combined sanitary list should be developed for all three batches. The fact that the formation of three separate batches affected the results of each batch, and that should have been determined in accordance with Rule 13 8 (2) of the Police Rules, 1934. Then determined the candidates' seniority instead of considering all the accomplices of the batches as a whole, according to their batches, thus the prepared list was a clear violation of Rule 13 8 (2) of the Police Rules, 1934. As the batches were acknowledged that they all passed in the same day, they would, therefore, be considered simultaneous, and the common result of all such course mates was the Rule 13 8 (2) of the Police Rules, 1934. Should be maintained accordingly. An appeal was granted and the department was instructed to act in accordance with Rule 13 8 (2) of the Police Rules, 1934.
