Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR HUSSAIN versus AFAQ AHMED

Section 13 Completion of the Student E-Asset Service Notice for Completion of the Suit Property as well as the Suit Property (which was also a real brother) Notice before any Ish Assad Notice is served to any shopkeeper personally on other vendor plates. The service of one of the distinguished shopkeepers should not be construed as a service to both vendors before being affected. The service of notice of such Talal Ishid was not a service of law, before the Emperor had not established the service of Talal Ishid's notice in this regard. The other shopkeeper was made confidentially by a registered post because the ply taken by the pre-emptor did not support any law, and was therefore unenforceable.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. MUHAMMAD YAHYA 2013 SCMR 684
• HAKIM KHAN v. State 2013 SCMR 698
• GHULAM SHABBIR v. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 2013 SCMR 700
• MEHMOOD AMJED v. ISLAMABAD CAPITAL TERRITORY POLICE through I.-G. Police, Islamabad 2013 SCMR 717
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.12 OF 2011 2013 SCMR 728
• Ch. MUHAMMAD MASAUD AKHTAR KHAN v. REGISTRAR LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2013 SCMR 730
• AGRO PACK (PVT.) LIMITED, PESHAWAR v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE PESHAWAR 2013 SCMR 742
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 SCMR 747

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

top advocate from Khangarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes