Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SIKANDAR ALI versus COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD DIVISION, HYDERABAD


Sindh Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 4 and 5 (4) (a) (b) Greater penalties under R5 (4) (a) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules. Enforcement of the authorized officer, 1973 gave the authority to impose only minor penalties on the civil servant, imposing a substantial penalty for termination of the job. If the authority officer had the idea of imposing a large fine, he would have to file papers with his recommendation. Had to be dispatched because it was the authority's authority and not the authorized officer's authority to impose a felony order dismissing the services approved by the authorized officer Imposed a substantial fine, was not eligible and was obliged to remain separate.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gojra lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.