Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR HUSSAIN versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KARACHI WEST

Sindh Police (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules 1988 R 6 (4) Mandatory Retirement Government employees who were police officers were fined a substantial fine for taking retirement from the job which they were accused of. Was mixed with criminals on the basis of which they were fined. Not only was the ambiguity, but also the general public, only the showcase notice was issued to the public servants, but no inquiry was made and the competent authority issued orders on only two documents against the government employees, the cause notice and the government employees. The answer is a legal requirement that two such documents be completed before conviction of civil servants in the absence of any material before the competent authority to approve punishment orders against public servants, especially when their There was no serious condemnation, no such penalty could be justified. Implemented the service tribunal, set aside orders passed against public servants and ordered them to re-rule in the interim service as a holiday, if there was any remaining famous lower court advocate from Minchanabad lawyer