ABDUL SAMAD versus DIRECTOR, EXCISE AND TAXATION (ADMN.), GOVERNMENT OF SINDH.
Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 11 Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974, RR5 (L)) and Termination of 12 Services, without giving any notice to the employees and giving them the opportunity to do so. Was terminated with effect - hearing on the basis that he was appointed regularly in violation of the appointment rules and was not approved or recommended by the Selection Committee of the Department. No specific irregularities were identified, nor were any official errors or omissions found flawed in the appointment process. The land was never made aware of the rules and government employees were not told to serve or serve before any department selection committee, the names of public servants were legally created. About a year after the termination of his services in the seniority list named and released, government employees that he was regularly appointed on the second basis, the support of the seniority list was supported by the balance of convenience. Whether regular employees were in favor of regular employees, government employees and not authority, even if they were officers. Was the official appointment of office was then, provide a mechanism for service outages. Such public servants were required to come under section 11 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, which was last seen as principle but was not resorted to by the authority while terminating the services of civil servants while terminating the services of public servants. Was ordered to do, which was very bad. The law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
