Find a Lawyer

SIRAJUDDIN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sindh Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 5 (4) (b) The Government of Sindh Servants (Practices) Rules, 1966, R 28 Implementation of the Minor Penalty for Preventing Annual Increases in the Primary, Lower One of the major downsizing penalties was the imposition of a charge sheet on a civil servant and a 5-year period after an inquiry against him. Had protested against the registration of cases by anti-corruption establishment officials for alleged misconduct. The lower penalties for the 5-year period allocated for rain / flood victims were converted into minor penalties for two years before the annual increase on the Department of Appeals was changed to a government tribunal employee. He confessed that he had attended the meeting and had nowhere to say that he had left the meeting and was separated from himself because of controversial speech or controversial subject matter. In which the government employee participated, it was discussed and consequently the release of the press, the Sindh Government Duct) was a violation of Rule 28 R of 1966, in which case a public servant, could not do so. Avoid legal liability arising from a meeting in which he participated from start to finish, especially when he did not present any press clippings in his defense which he published in published newspapers. As a result of the condemnation, it was said that the objectionable meeting department authority had already taken a soft stand. Big crime Pakistan, top advocate family court from Matli lawyer