Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KABIRWALA

West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Provisions of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Applicable Family Court for the Rehabilitation proceedings against O XVII, R 3 Suite Family Court, Removal of evidence by wife and children Against the husband / father who failed to present his evidence despite repeated delays, he was approved by the Family Court for the purpose of requesting the provisions of OXVI, R3, CPC Close the evidence of the father at your convenience and refreshments and continue to seek motions to extend the action indefinitely, even though the family core It did not apply to the proceedings before Tee, yet said the court had the power to close the evidence of the parties. The Family Court did not act as such. Such order was completely lawful in the circumstances in order to close the evidence illegally or without jurisdiction. famous supreme court advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer