Find a Lawyer

CANTONMENT BOARD, RAWALPINDI versus ABDUL AZIZ QURESHI

Under the Code of Civil Code 1908 section 115 amendments to the Code of Conduct, the co-ordinator of the past and responding to the review of the closed transaction was the owner who owned the house transferred to him by the Department of Settlement and Rehabilitation In 1970, the applicant was released into the cantonment. Despite the fact that the board had refused to approve the building project offered by the defendant, the Director, Military Lands and the Cantonment Board had instructed the Board to consider the defendant's claim, taking the necessary issue from the civil Refused to leave. The Court of Appeals and the Court of Appeal had passed an order under which the findings of the cases filed by the courts were to ascertain the fact and, being in harmony, the jurisdiction of PTD. / I was exempt from the High Court intervention. The transfer was not questioned by the board, nor did anyone in the organizational structure of the courts under the S, finalize the rules of rehabilitation, thus, nor was it called for in any compulsive action taken by the board. Could be done and his role in the whole process was outdated. top civil advocates from Muridkay lawyer