Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SARWAR versus STATE

Testimonies of Pakistan Panel Code Section 302/34 The testimony of eye witnesses was not only closely related to the deceased but they were also witnesses of interest as well as of the occasion and their presence near the victim at the time of the incident was highly suspected. The FIR was lodged with significant delays and the explanation presented in this regard is neither credible nor an acceptable Ocular account was verified by an independent source whose purpose was set by the prosecution. And was weak, with no recent indication that the accused had no weapon to offer aggression against the accused, recovered from the two accused. Was recovered and the other two accused were legally unforgettable, whose last day of physical remand they were badly affected and it was not proven that they were stained with human blood nor. It was committed. In the presence of the recovery witness, the sealed parcel was substantially reduced the supporting role of medical evidence for serious suspicions, which otherwise could not help identify the assailants on the benefit of the suspect in the circumstances. Was acquitted. when you need a advocate from Chak 46 lawyer