Find a Lawyer

NAZEER-UD-DIN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Arts 25, 2, 2A and 1991 Constitutional application for the eligibility of special seats for the children of the educational institution's admissions policy and the inclusion of those seats in the merit quota Applicants' claim for the protection of the quota of teachers and the first entry The year of the FA / FSC classes on the basis of kinship was not based on any legal right. All citizens of the state, who have a status in the society, have equal rights under Articles 2, 2A and 25 of the Constitution. In this way, a section of society cannot be treated differently. The protection of other city seats, whether the children of teachers, were discri- mated to the close or extracurricular activities; thus, by raising the door for irregularities and opening the doors, the teachers' children could not be given any preferential right over the children; Who performed better in exams. And the high-ranking government in merit advised the High Court to consider eliminating all types of reserve seats in advertising, for the protection of seats for teachers and children on the basis of education at all levels. The mission, therefore, was not sustained under the circumstances Pakistan, top advocate family court from Arifwala lawyer