AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus IMTIAZ AHMED GILL
Civil service option constitutional jurisdiction for voluntary retirement under the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 212 (2) Golden Hand Shake Scheme, Government employee implementing the High Court decision under Article 212 of the bar exercise constitution, a bank employee Opted for voluntary retirement under the Golden Hand Shake Scheme and obtained partial financial benefits at the bank's chairman's bank, with no legal authority and without the approval of the board of directors, allowing the public servant to withdraw his option. , But the authorized authority did not allow it. They filed a constitutional petition before the High Court to allow them to resume their services at the bank and pay their salaries with all attendance benefits. The High Court, while accepting the request of the government employees, did not instruct the government employees to stop the duty. The essence of the charge and its duty was to summarize that there was an order to commemorate the voluntary retirement order of the public servant, which did not fall under the constitutional domain of the High Court, the order to withdraw the option and consequently the civil servant. Was one of the terms and conditions of the rehabilitation service and controversy arose over such matters. Article 212 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) prohibited the jurisdiction of the service tribunal of the High Court in such matters.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Sehar Baqlas lawyer