SHERAL versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Reuse of Evidence There was enmity between the parties. The story of the prosecution was extremely impossible as five people were armed, variously arrived on the spot, but only one bullet was recorded on the victim and the other prisoners in the house. There was no damage. Reportedly the majority of the accused could have been denied, in the absence of any material collision coming from an independent source, the defendants could not be counted on. The witnesses appeared, the statements of the prosecution witnesses about the places where they found the incident were highly unlikely and the material contradictions from which they had seen the FIR were lodged after a preliminary inquiry and the basis for the incident was not proved. , Medical evidence was in dispute Failed to bring prosecution with ocular evidence The house was found to be a crime, the accused was tried and convicted and acquitted of the charge
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Topi lawyer
