STATE versus NAZIR AHMAD
The prosecution's convictions regarding the abduction allegations in Articles 365 and 365 A / 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 (1973), Article 185 (3) were that there was legal evidence that legitimized the sentence. Was not reviewed by the High Court. When the kidnapper, in particular, correctly identified the accused person in the identification parade, the ransom money was ordered by the High Court to be returned to the accused and led to several public-importance laws. Are also included. In the light of the dispute raised by the prosecution in this case, the Supreme Court granted leave of appeal to reproduce the evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Guddu lawyer
