SHER BAHADUR versus SUB-COSS-II (PVT.) LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Applicants requesting a complaint claim that they are the employees of the respondents and their services have been terminated orally for the same reason that the relationship between the parties between the employer and the employees. Was denied and specifically denied the Labor Court, after recording the evidence of the parties, rejected the complaint request stating that the employer-employee relationship was not between the parties. Claimed to have employed the applicants, but they were unsuccessful. Failure to disclose it through any evidence, failure to include evidence of the respondents will not preclude the applicant from proving and establishing his case by providing evidence of court satisfaction which will result in his The complaint was rightly rejected by the Labor Court,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Sargodha lawyer
