Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HALEEM KHAN NISHAT LAKHNAVI versus MESSRS HAJI ABDUL LATEEF & CO.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 51 Complaint Request Employees whose services were terminated were again charged by the Labor Court for refusing to submit to their grievance and were accused of not joining duty. And it was alleged that he reported for the job, but it was not implemented. And as a result, he had to send his resignation to the employer. The employer claimed that the employee had failed to join duty despite the letter. He was sent to join duty and, according to the Labor Court order, the employer was always willing to take him in but became an employee to avoid resumption of responsibility for the validity of the Long Excuses Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 After the complaint filed by the employees under Section 25A & 51, the Labor Court rightly dismissed because the employees were ordered to be reinstated while they failed to resume their duty. The Labor Court ordered employees to resume their duties voluntarily law firms from Sudhnoti lawyer