SALEEM-UR-REHMAN versus N.-W.F.P.
Sections 13 and 15 (5) Civil Procedure Code (V o; 1908), O, XXVI, R 9 In their written statement, the tenant claimed that his property was illegal or that the rental shop was owned by him. Instead of an end-to-end ruling of the tenancy appellate court, the counsel for both parties was instructed that a commission to assess the cost of the super-structure agreed with the consenting parties. Will be prevented from protesting the matter until a final decision is reached. In the appeal, the appellate court applied the same principles of law to avoid litigation at the request of both parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Shadiwal lawyer
