Find a Lawyer

SHER BAHADAR versus GHAFFAR ALI KHAN

Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the accused in the trial of the cancellation of the bail, was admitted to the defendant according to the medical evidence There was only one injury while the two accused were indicted, which showed that it did not definitively prove which shot was effective and the trial court justified in granting bail to the accused in this case. Was not because the accused was charged with firing in the FIR along with his co-accused because even in the statements of witnesses under Sections 161 and 164, the CCP fact Since the charges against the accused were common in nature and the victim was not charged for any particular injury, no further investigation will be prosecuted against the accused, both accused allegedly fired. He was shot by Kalashnikov, resulting in his injuries and death, and it was perfectly clear at the bailout stage that his bullet was investigated. Two fatal people were charged with wounding the body of the victim alone, but there is a reasonable basis for believing that the accused committed a non-bailable offense that could result in the death sentence or life imprisonment. I am not entitled to a guaranteed bail. The accused was not used at his discretion properly in granting bail, and according to the rules of the law, the request for cancellation of the bail was accepted in the circumstances. property advocate from Phool nagar lawyer