Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SARHAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, N.-W.F.P. versus JEHANZEB


Sections 15 (2) and 17 of Pakistan Pay (1973), Article 199 of the Salary Payment Act 1936, Article 199 failed to inspect the applicant / employer respondent / employee to maintain the constitutional application, thus the Authority Awarded on request under Section 15 (2). ) Instead of filing an appeal under section 17 of the Payment Wages Act, 1936, the applicant / employer had filed an application for the separation of such award and the same from the Authority. Was excluded where the alternative to appeal was available against the authority's order and was not taken advantage of, the applicant could not be allowed to violate the law by constitutional application. The old constitutional petition was excluded because it had no illegal interference or error.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Ludhan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.