Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SARHAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, N.-W.F.P. versus JEHANZEB


Sections 15 (2) and 17 of Pakistan Pay (1973), Article 199 of the Salary Payment Act 1936, Article 199 failed to inspect the applicant / employer respondent / employee to maintain the constitutional application, thus the Authority Awarded on request under Section 15 (2). ) Instead of filing an appeal under section 17 of the Payment Wages Act, 1936, the applicant / employer had filed an application for the separation of such award and the same from the Authority. Was excluded where the alternative to appeal was available against the authority's order and was not taken advantage of, the applicant could not be allowed to violate the law by constitutional application. The old constitutional petition was excluded because it had no illegal interference or error.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Mailsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.