SHAKIRULLAH versus HIDAYATULLAH
Article 163 of the Law Evidence Order 1984 Decision on a case based on oath, was, of course, a method for settling matters, but at the same time the courts were bound to handle such matters with great care. Because the sensitivity of such matters involves the court's avoidance of haste and the emotional actions of the court. The court will also have to scrutinize the relevant records and record the required statements and no statement has been recorded on the statement so far, and the matter of alleged presentation and acceptance is the result of a heated debate between the plaintiff and the defendant. Was. The court, at a stage when the plaintiff was going to record his examination in the Chief Trial Court, had rightly found that the offer and acceptance of the oath was contentious, a trial court rightly disputing the case on the merit. Was directed to present evidence to decide.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Mingora lawyer