MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE
Pakistan Panel Code Section 408 Definition of Evidence. The complainant and other prosecution witnesses, all the bank employees, were liable for misuse of the money, giving all the necessary details of the allegations at trial, and no one was charged with personal enmity. ? No material was ever brought on the record to cast doubt on the witnesses, nor their positive statements, the contradictory evidence proved the contentious signatures that were taken by the accused were not proven by them. It was alleged that after his release the duty was discharged by the bank authority through a showcase notice that he had proved his involvement in the crime that the money was misused as a public money. , He was not entitled to any kind of relaxation and the conviction of the accused was maintained in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Haroonabad lawyer