Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE


Pakistan Panel Code Section 408 Definition of Evidence. The complainant and other prosecution witnesses, all the bank employees, were liable for misuse of the money, giving all the necessary details of the allegations at trial, and no one was charged with personal enmity. ? No material was ever brought on the record to cast doubt on the witnesses, nor their positive statements, the contradictory evidence proved the contentious signatures that were taken by the accused were not proven by them. It was alleged that after his release the duty was discharged by the bank authority through a showcase notice that he had proved his involvement in the crime that the money was misused as a public money. , He was not entitled to any kind of relaxation and the conviction of the accused was maintained in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Bhara Kahu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.