Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR UNIVERSITY

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974 Section 44 University Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act, 1985, Section 10 (2) and 38 Written Requests, Eligibility of Applicant / Government Employee to be employed after inquiry into allegations of corruption against him. Was dismissed. , Challenged the order to file a direct writ petition against his dismissal, so it was objected that he was not eligible because the relevant rules in the case of appeals, revisions and revisions, rejecting the appropriate alternative order. The order was available to applicants / government employees. The service was approved by the applicant / public servant Assistant Registrar and Vice-Chancellor, who was the Chairman of the Syndicate, was the appellate authority under Section 38 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act 1985 and there is no doubt about the rules to be abolished, It showed that the Vice-Chancellor also agreed with the inquiry officer's recommendations, but it was not enough to conclude that the appeal before the Syndicate, whose Vice-Chancellor was the Chairman, would be a futile exercise if the Vice-Chancellor. Agree with the inquiry officer's report, do not even present the appeal-related provisions to the plaintiff because the offending The applicant / civil servant has failed to avail of suitable alternatives. Appeal to the Vice-Chancellor, who was the Chairman of the Syndicate, his writ petition was dismissed as ineligible. lawer from fb area from Tando Jam lawyer