Find a Lawyer

IQBAL RAZZAQ BUTT versus ABDUS SALAM BUTT

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules 1978 O XLVI, R1 Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), O XLVII, R1 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIIII 1974), Section 42 of the Supreme Court decision Election High Court Did the nomination of the papers filed by the applicant from the particular constituency was declared illegal and illegal. Order canceled by the District Magistrate issuing a State Subject Certificate in favor of the applicant. And announced that the selection of the winning assembly seat by the applicant failed to appeal to the Supreme Court. An example of practicing the jurisdiction of a review is that the discovery of a new and important case on the evidence should be such that the matter remains stable after practice. Information about the relevant party was not applicable and could not be presented at the relevant time when the Petitioner had passed the Decree on the preparation of the Prerogative Table on the basis of which he was seeking review. It was not claimed that such evidence existed during the judgment. Under this, the review was granted that the petitioner did not even assert that he had, after careful practice, discovered an important piece of evidence, on which he sought to review the decision. Was the reason for which the Pedigree table is now being offered, admittedly, in the knowledge of the applicant, which, in particular, may be presented to the High Court or to the Supreme Court when the applicant has reviewed. In his plea for, he did not allege that he has now discovered a piece of evidence that could be found in the presence of alternative therapies. top civil advocates from Khanbel lawyer