Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus ABDULLAH


The Conan e-evidence Order 1984 Arts 72, 74 and 76 Secondary Proof Record of Production did not suggest that the original document was lost or unavailable or that it could not be submitted without further delay or that it was the same. The case was available on record. The effect of the court will not be sufficient to give the party the right to produce a copy of the original document, to present the secondary evidence, unless the conditions in Article 76 of the Convention of Evidence, 1984, for the preparation of the secondary evidence are satisfied. , Documents are considered to be unverified copies of the alleged documents. Original document, cannot be trusted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Mubarik Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.