Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus ABDULLAH

The Conan e-evidence Order 1984 Arts 72, 74 and 76 Secondary Proof Record of Production did not suggest that the original document was lost or unavailable or that it could not be submitted without further delay or that it was the same. The case was available on record. The effect of the court will not be sufficient to give the party the right to produce a copy of the original document, to present the secondary evidence, unless the conditions in Article 76 of the Convention of Evidence, 1984, for the preparation of the secondary evidence are satisfied. , Documents are considered to be unverified copies of the alleged documents. Original document, cannot be trusted famous supreme court advocate from Zhob lawyer