DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR versus ABDUL NABI
Rules, Regulations 1908 Sections 79 and 0 1, Rr 3, 10 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Declaration of Order, Dismissal and Revenue Entries To rectify the case, the plaintiffs, who claimed that the suit land was their original property, prayed that the registration of the land be canceled for display in the name of the provincial government and directed them to enter in favor of the plaintiffs. And the plaintiffs should be called owners. Land-related entries in the Property for Controversy have been in the name of the provincial government in the relevant revenue records since 1958 59 when the plaintiffs' case was settled by the plaintiffs, under the circumstances, the recorded owner / provincial government. Should have acted as defendant in the lawsuit filed by them. In view of the requirements of Section 7979, Civil Procedure Code, 8 of 1908, they have been condemned as being an essential party of the Provincial Government; the courts below have sued without requiring the necessary party to be defendant. Were not allowed to do
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Multan lawyer