MUHAMMAD YASIN KHAN versus DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, MULTAN DIVISION, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 2 (xxviii) and the 25A Railway Employee Complaint Petition Maintenance Petitioner, which filed a complaint before the Labor Court under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was held in a supervisory position. And was drawing Rs 3000 as monthly salary. Applicants cannot claim to be employees in BPS 11, keeping manual duty, especially when all railway employees were declared public servants and could discharge their jobs, if any of the Government Employees Act. 1973. Appealing to the Federal Service Tribunal after terminating all departmental treatment gives the applicant's oral claim that someone else is not acting on his behalf; the applicant will not file a complaint petitioner's complaint, the Labor Court Had no jurisdiction over it. Case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Ahmadpur East lawyer
