Find a Lawyer

MULAZIM HUSSAIN versus ABDUL JALIL

Law Reform Ordinance 1972 Section 302/324/148/149 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court Appeal Registration of the second case filed under the first FIR did not disclose the correct facts and a favor Represented the story. Police and authority and if the same story is treated as a prosecutor's story and allowed to continue the investigation on the basis of this, it would change the direction of the case and the proceedings of the Assistant Commissioner, police officers and their masters. Can be justified. Despite the fact that the citizens of the procession were citizens of the lives of two innocent persons and several injured people, they were not forcibly banning any crime through state violence in public places and no person in the authority was charged with any citizen. Couldn't stop the movement. Except as required by law and, in any case, the participants were not allowed to have the life and liberty of participating in the procession procession between citizens and public workers, filed against the illegal operation of civil servants by the citizens. A complaint made under the law must be of full weight and cannot be treated as a general complaint. No doubt, in the case of the counter version, in the case of the counter version, the incident could not be registered, but immediately, this report disclosing the actual facts should have been entertained and forwarded according to which The two allegations contained in the stories could have been investigated together, but it is permissible to file a case against a police officer refusing to expose the story of a refusing police officer. best advocate from Quetta lawyer