Find a Lawyer

NAZIM HUSSAIN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 528 Termination Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 3 and 4 Additional Sessions Judge I / Special Court II Withdrawal of pending case by a Sessions Judge Withdrawn. Without notice to the accused at the request of the complainant in the Special Court I and the Sessions Judge / Special Court I transferred it in his file as the case was earlier referred to Additional Sessions Judge I / Special Judge II, the Sessions Judge. / Special court I was left with someone. The jurisdiction to withdraw the case and start the case on its own because the powers of the Special Court 1 and Special Court II were free and equal in every respect, even otherwise, transferring the case from one special court to another The pressure of activities was implemented under Section 4A. ) Act, 1975, according to which the application for transfer of the case from one special court to another was only before the High Court and the Special Courts had no such jurisdiction. Sessions for the transfer of powers from 588 to another, under special court cases like CCPC, were misunderstood, unable to transfer the case to Special Court II themselves, returned the case. The order to move his file through Special Court II and Special Court I was set aside, and the proceedings failed under such an unlawful order. property advocates from Jauharabad lawyer