EJAZ RAHIM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts and 212 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Civil Service Constitutional Application Constitutional Petitions Required by the applicant / Government employee under the terms of the Constitution 212 of the High Court's jurisdiction repeatedly. As related and the terms of service for which the Service Tribunal was also the appropriate forum in relation to mutual orders, the applicant / government employee waited in the appropriate authority bar of Article 212 to decide on his / her representation. Filed without constitutional application and approached the High Court. As of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, no jurisdiction was identified in the issue of discipline as there was a lack of competence of the departmental authorities to prosecute the applicant / civil servant. ? If an order has been approved by the department, questions regarding the law and the facts may be raised before the service tribunal. Authority Petitioner / Civil S Controversy This Issue Was Made Fault Due To Not Being In The Jurisdiction Of The Federal Service Tribunal, The Constitutional Appeal Filed By The Applicant / Government Employer
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer