Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus RAHEELA ASLAM

Appeal against the 14 Pakistan mutual orders was upheld by the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the trial was adjourned to prove the plaintiff's order. The defendant filed an appeal on the ground of violation of the evidence of the plaintiff's order, which was dismissed by the Additional District Judge on that basis. Appeal against inter-Muslim order does not lie The defendant has claimed that not only an order was issued under section 14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, but any decision of the Family Court was a competent hearing and its Although this order was inherently inherent, the decision is synonymous and can be appealed against the plaintiff of the petition because even though the word verdict was mentioned in section 14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, it was also dismissed. The genius had to be read and it should be colored using the final order, the final orders would be subject to word judgment. This was, thus, rightly disqualified against the inward order best advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer