AMJAD ALI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, L.D.A., LAHORE
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Termination of Section O12 Services which was designated as Work Charge Employee, was terminated. Many times, after the termination of the 89th term. She remained in the same position for several days and eventually terminated her services verbally without any reason for which the employee against the post still exists, and after the employee's dismissal another man was employed. Was the fit He was the youngest junior to establish an employee at the time of termination of the job, leaving an employee on the staff for only 89 days (less than the tenure period). Could not be allowed to happen. Under the circumstances, one can claim regular and consistent service and cannot be irrationally excluded from the service. The Labor Court was ordered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Chaman lawyer