MUHAMMAD BAHADUR versus STATE
Definition of evidence in Pakistan Panel Code Sections 302 (b), 324, 353 and 186. The complainant and two others who were police officers and witnesses of the incident who witnessed the two stabbed to the stables and others were injured, provided convincing details of the incident and successfully conducted a rigorous cross-examination examination and The statements of such witnesses were corroborated by the injured prosecution witnesses who requested the defense, which proved to be false, fabricated and a symbol of the accused's imagination, completely dismissing / denying it. Was responsible for the rejection of witnesses who were present at the scene, beyond any doubt, and who completely The prosecution had full support from the prosecution witnesses, there was no conflict of interest or suspicion from the two victims. The medical account was presented by the doctor, who examined the prosecution's injured witnesses shortly after the incident and Mido had proven the legal report. In this connection, the doctor had a post mortem inspection repo, saying that the victims died from fireworks wounds and that the report proves the prosecution's prosecution against the accused. His allegations, which have been completely proved by his ocular account, medical evidence and recoveries, he was properly sentenced and sentenced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Rabwah lawyer