MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus ALTAF HUSSAIN
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Sections 2 (a) and 13 (6) While defending the tenant's accuracy, the landlord has filed a preliminary request for payment of rent, Raised that he is under the jurisdiction of the rent controller. The area was a factory located in the Industrial Area and was rented for the same purpose, without deciding the first object raised by the tenants, the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 Rental Controller. Was unable to control the rent controller under the provisions. In connection with the lack of jurisdiction, a temporary rent order was approved under section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, in which the tenant was instructed to submit the outstanding rent and rent. Failed to submit certified rent. Temporarily complying with the rental order, its defense was abolished and it was directed to vacate the cover order for re-submission and proceedings under section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Civilian Rent Ordinance 1959. I may approve, the rent controller having determined the jurisdiction over the tenant's objection to the jurisdiction for the first time, determined their jurisdiction. Without legal authority and absolutely illegal, defending a tenant cannot tolerate sanctions in the event of any breach.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer