Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAFEEZ versus STATE

Section 2 302/34 App Testimonial Definition is the trigger for an incident which stated that the deceased's grandfather had appointed the accused as acting headman of the village and neglected the accused's father to take care of his land. Was also deposed. There was no evidence of complaint against the complainant's appointment either to the Revenue Authorities or to the cows or the elders of his brother's family that the accused's father had demanded revenge on his son, in these circumstances. , He was not persuaded of anything. To the extent that he should have murdered his own grandfather, especially when there was no complaint against the elder, MotoVI did not in any way attach the accused to the commission of the crime, the co-accused whose motive was Was not shown, it has no relation to the central The accused accused of extra-judicial confession before the accused involved with the crime, who could not be affected on the occasion Prosecution, the accused did not affect the case The prosecutor's case was that the accused sprinkled petrol on the accused persons. And they set him on fire, but according to medical evidence, he lost his life due to asthma or inhalation of toxic gases and the main cause of death was not burning. The complainant alleged that he did not firmly say that he saw the accused spraying petrol and setting the dead on fire. It was alleged that he was a resident of the same village and resided at his father's house. There was a fellow villager in the vicinity, fleeing to or near the event was never considered a serious incident, especially when it happened. list of supreme court advocates from Kabir Wala lawyer