Find a Lawyer

ISHTIAQ NAZIR versus THE STATE

The complainant who appreciated the Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 evidence, who was an R-Star witness in the case, said in his cross-examination that he could not identify any of the accused at the identity parade, contradicting the statements of other prosecution witnesses Were. Proceedings of the Identity Parade together The prosecution concludes that the accused were properly identified in the identity parade, they had no legal power, in the circumstances the process of identification cannot be relied upon where the effect of recovery. He was not owned by the accused. It was in their possession that the articles recovered were not in the exclusive possession of each accused and their property was not in their exclusive knowledge that it could be alleged that the material produced by the prosecution in the case of recovery was legal. Cannot proceed. The related recovery of property was attributable to each of the accused. The accused had no legal power. The prosecution failed to prove the accused beyond suspicion, the trial court convicted the accused and set aside the sentence. And they were acquitted of the charges. when you need a advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer