Find a Lawyer

DILDAR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Anti-Corruption Act (Second 1947), section 5 (2), was filed with the Defendants for appreciating the evidence in which it alleged that it had posted the relevant area as Patwari. And at the same time, he had accumulated the wrong amount of land revenue and used it illegally. The assessee / co-accused was responsible for collecting the land revenue from the landlord and the accused had no option to collect the lease, so the documents were not presented to show that the accused. Was ever found. The assignment of money to an accused by one of the landlords and the allegedly deceiving suspect could not be proved on the record, in the ocular account presented by the prosecutor's witness, the denial of the co-accused was denied. The court had acquitted the accused on the basis of the same evidence. The person who had already disbelieved the co-accused, in which case the prosecution was not safe. The prosecution failed to prove his case beyond any doubt, the accused would, in turn, benefit the accused from the accused. Was acquitted top advocate from Diamer lawyer