MUHAMMAD RAFAQAT versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 417 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), appeal filed against the FIR of section 325/148/149, was filed a month later after the incident by the police. The offensive weapons used as a weapon were not recovered. The injured witness had a medico legal report, but was not presented to the medical examiner and even the radiologist was not presented to the x-ray to testify about his injuries, No medical evidence regarding other injured witnesses was presented by the prosecutor. Counter version was filed against the complainant and other prosecution witnesses, they were tried, but were acquitted, the prosecution testified. Was the witness and the other was the injured witness and the prosecution witness who did not support the prosecution's case, Mill Hostile accusations against the rest had not been completely defective and prosecutors. He was also unable to recover the weapons of the crime and was also unable to commit the crime from home. The appellate court's decision on the suspects beyond reasonable doubt, according to which the accused is well-reasoned Was acquitted after being taken off the record, circumstances cannot be interfered with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kahror Pacca lawyer