ZIAUL HASAN versus STATE
R4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Periodic Employment Service Period Job Appeal As well as appeal of service of public servants were excluded and justification for their dismissal was proved by the record. That a civil servant was treated. The former employee's record of not-so-good public servant has also indicated that he was given many opportunities to improve his behavior but failed to do so. The dismissal order was approved for his dismissal. The son, who was abusive with the staff of the Establishment Service Tribunal, after proper scrutiny of the available materials before it was discovered that the civil servant had accompanied his son at the time of the incident, as well. The utility of the mill should be specifically requested. Vague allegations, no civil inquiries can be made
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Quetta lawyer