MUHAMMAD ASIM KURD versus MIR LASHKARI KHAN RAISANI
Representation of Public Act 1976 Section 67 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The re-counting of the votes of the applicants during the approval of the constitutional petition The High Court declared the applicants invalid and approved the election tribunal. Approved constitutional application dismissed. The High Court rejected the applicant's constitutional request on the ground that the electoral rules provided for the distribution of forums to strengthen the forums and that the applicants' right to appeal against the defamation order, was denied by the High Court. Was prevented from taking constitutional jurisdiction of When, in the context of the plea of the parties, it is proved that he passed away when the respondents exclusively alleged that the applicant teased the election staff with the statement of accounts. Thus, when such a technical point was considered simplicity, an illegal election could not be declared that the tribunal could order the counting of votes in appropriate cases and after the satisfaction of the required conditions, after the interim injunction, Final order pending with Election Tribunal: Appeal against Supreme Court applicants against final order of Election Tribunal Will be at liberty to file. If and when such objections are raised to report to the Election Commission on the counting of votes, the Election Tribunal will consider justice, fair and lawfully, after giving the parties an opportunity to hear and present evidence in support of them. After giving permission to do so. If there is a will, relevant deficiencies, the circumstances of the appeal leave before the final election petition can be settled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Sibi lawyer