Find a Lawyer

WAZIRZADA versus CHIEF OF AIR STAFF, PAKISTAN AIR FORCE

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The dismissal of the employment of civil servants, along with the relevant department appeals, dismissed the appeal of the government employees and their 'S termination of employment was justified. The record clearly indicated that the civil servant's treatment to the public servant was unacceptable. Former government employee records also indicated that he was given many opportunities to improve his conduct but failed to do so. It was approved for the abusive son's conduct with the staff of the Establishment Service Tribunal, and after proper scrutiny of the materials previously available, it was determined that the civil servant was involved in the incident. With his son at the time of Specifically, the request should be made, while after the vague allegations, no one can investigate. However, the public servant has failed to include any kind of evidence in support of his dirty allegations. A public servant belonging to the party teaching the responsible department must comply with the official orders of his son, who is not in control of his son's abusive behavior. At the time of the incident, denying orders to his officers but also to his son was unforgivable and there were no defects or legal weaknesses in the reasons assigned by the service tribunal in the dismissal of civil servants. registration advocate from Piplan lawyer