Retiring Omar (Chief Justice of Pakistan), claiming that a Supreme Court judge points to a constitutional petition filed before the Supreme Court under Articles 184 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 179 and 184 (3). The defendant was born not in 1932 but in 1932, and thus could not remain in office even after attaining the age of 65, which was not the case which was required to be heard before the full court for the interpretation hearing. Article 179 or any other part of the Constitution was not required
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
