PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB versus SAEED AHMED
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 187 and 185 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OXXIII, R6 accused were sentenced to imprisonment and whipping, in which the Military Military Court also imposed a fine of Rs. And ordered to confiscate their agricultural land in Pakistan from the High Court but retained the sentence of the accused but concluded that under the relevant martial law / rule, the Military Military Court had to pass an order to confiscate the agricultural land. Was not entitled, accuracy Supreme Court first deposited a certain amount of penalty which was kept in the registrar's official account. Referring to the High Court's order that summary military court was not authorized to confiscate the agricultural land of the accused, the order of the High Court was not sought to interfere with any provision of the Martial Law Order. The military court summarized about 25% of each woman and 90% of the increase in women would not participate, while the remaining 10% would go to the state.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer