RAHMAT ULLAH versus MITHA KHAN
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Act to sell its signature / thumb impression for the specific performance of the contract to sell the evidence (10 of 1984), Article 78 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for the plaintiff. Denies the contract, then the trial court rejected the plaintiff's plea and asked the defendant to summon the defendant, but the same was accepted by the trial court. Done The plaintiff's main complaint was that her trial was still pending in court, so it was not required. In the case of the Personal Off Record, asking him to confirm his thumb on the contract shows that the defendant's representation is being represented by his lawyer and there is every possibility that the defendant may Do Not Appear in Court Defendant directed that the court be brought to the conclusion of the case. Reeve's incomplete order sentencing the court to confirm the contents of the document, including the impression of his thumb, did not face any illegal interference.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Noshki lawyer